For example, the data show better-performing medical practices:
- Use formal patient satisfaction surveys. More than 30 percent benchmark results to other practices and more than 60 percent educate physicians about behavior.
- Spent more on information technology operating expenses than their counterparts (with the exception of multi-specialty practices).
- Report less bad debt to fee-for-service activity per full-time-equivalent (FTE) physician.
- Report lower total operating costs as a percentage of total medical revenue.
- Consistently note more procedures per FTE physician.
- Have a lower percentage of total A/R in the 120-plus-day category than their counterparts, indicating that strong cash flow is crucial to the success of any practice.
Meanwhile, organizations deemed “better-performing medical practices” by the MGMA's Performance and Practices of Successful Medical Groups: 2010 Report Based on 2009 Data excelled in four categories.
- profitability and cost management;
- productivity, capacity and staffing;
- accounts receivable and collections; and
- patient satisfaction.
The data is based on responses from 544 practices that responded to the MGMA 2010 Cost Survey and a supplemental questionnaire that assessed practices and procedures.
http://www.mgma.com/pm/article.aspx?id=9198
Can you provide any additional details regarding your patient sat benchmarking program? We have been using a customized Press-Ganey survey, but do not have any conparative data to use with it!
ReplyDelete